🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.