🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.